I hope that we have not too quickly forgotten that

The God of Abrahamic religions does not exist.  If God exists, then God is not of a human form.  I suppose that if penguins believed in God, then God would be in the form of a penguin.  We see God as a micromanager, a straw boss, a pissed-off feudal chieftain erasing the poor sinners from the earth like Clorox against cold viruses.

God, if She exists, doesn’t care about us.  Caring is a uniquely mammal emotion, and one evolved over the millennia to produce more mammals.  Fish, once they are hatched from eggs, have no use for their young.  A plecostomus will happily eat another plecostomus.

These are realizations in the process of being realized.

All God’s will, you know.  But God doesn’t have a will, or even a won’t; God is a mathematical abstraction like pi or e, but much less useful in the construction of MP3 players.  God won’t help you square a circle or figure out the frequencies present in a Lady Gaga song.  For that you gotta fall back on science.

As science grows, God shrinks; God is the collection of things we can’t explain by any other means.  How come the God-damn dishwasher keeps overflowing!  Well, that would be God’s fault.  God damned the dishwasher, you see, or else that Maytag would be running fine today.

It’s sad and scary, living a life without God present, in the same way I imagine it would be sad living without your parents.  God’s basically a surrogate for your dad and your mom, all rolled into one, the magical superparent looking out for your welfare at all times.  God is the Final Recourse, the one to complain to when no one else will listen.

Except of course, God doesn’t exist and therefore it’s only physics and your own capabilities of self-care.

God’s a complaint box stuffed to overflowing, letters and notes that will never be read, because there is no one there to read them.

We are all together, on our own.

Let us pray.

It is 5 a.m. and you are listening to Los Angeles

Telling a story good is hard.  Telling a good story is even harder.

You don’t grow up in the backwoods of West Virginia without being taught how to tell a story.  I remember my Uncle Masel regaling me at length about teaching junior high school class.  “And them kids in the back of the room would jest start talkin… and they’d get up and ornery… and I wouldn’t say a word, I’d jest open my little black book and next to thar names I’d jest wrat a little letters, I’d wrat D.M.”  And here he’d pause imperceptibly.

“Dahreaah of the mouth,” he’d say.  And the pause was always perfectly timed..

I read a lot of new material.  Now and then I judge the Orange County Playwright Association’s competitions.  I read a lot of new material for friends; I audition now and then for new plays and new movies; I listen to a lot of stories.

Most writers have script format down cold.  Most of them have nailed concepts of pace and tone, and many of them know how to create beautiful and compelling universes.  Many of them get produced and get their scripts made into films and plays.

What they don’t know how to do, almost to a one, is tell a story.  Telling a story is not something you can pick up at a tony conference, and it’s not something you can learn how to do by reading a book or two.  Almost anyone can tell whether a story or a song is good, but the ability to create compelling stories or songs is a gift bestowed upon the the very patient and the very industrious.

I hate my own work.  I retool it dozens, maybe hundreds, of times before it ever gets to a state where an audience might see it.  Every moment of a Byrd story has been milled over and retold and rethought and retooled until it resonates within the character of the entire piece.

One writer I know has written maybe a dozen full length plays in the time it’s taken me to write one.  In his case, he can’t get any of his shit produced.

That’s a problem, thankfully, I have never experienced yet.

Quality, quality, quality.  It all comes down to craft.  Are you willing to roundfile a thousand mediocre stories to find one perfect diamond?  Are you willing to retell and retell and retell a story, even before the first bit of dialogue ever hits the page?

Most writers are dreadfully, dreadfully lazy.

I have read far too many scripts of late where the payoff is the Reveal — the bit of story element that all the characters spend dancing and talking around —

He was really a robot all along!

He was really an alien all along!

He was really her father all along!

Sigh.

Failure to tell a story at a reasonable tempo does not constitute suspense.

What constitutes a great story really hasn’t changed very much over the years.  The best books I’ve read on the topic to date are Lajos Egri’s “The Art of Dramatic Writing” and Robert McKee’s “Story”.  Both books spend a considerable amount of time dissecting functional stories to figure out why they work.

I can think of no better use of one’s time as a writer than studying, and copying, the best of the best.

I believe strongly in emulating other successful storytellers and their processes.  The best professional storytelling today comes out of Pixar, which has a strongly collaborative writing process.  Every script out of Pixar has a dozen or so story artists working on the project.

It must be such a luxury having a dozen minds working together on a coherent set of story threads, trying to make sure that no pieces are left dangling, no bits of character are left over, that nothing is wasted, that every element resonates properly.

Story, dammit, story!

I’m the operator with my pocket calculator

This web site has just received a facelift.  It’s now running on a WordPress core instead of the ancient Nucleus blogging platform, and it’s running CentOS 7 on an Amazon server somewhere in Oregon.  Migrating all the old data to an entirely new architecture was quite an experience in SQL and PHP hacking.  Webmin helped glue everything together.  Here’s hoping this new architecture lasts ten more years.

Ooooo child things are gonna get brighter

Jessica Tams
Managing Director
Casual Games Association
P.O. Box 305
Smithfield, UT 84335

Dear Ms. Tams:

At your Casual Connect conference last week, I was very pleased to see that there was a Women’s Lunch sponsored by DeNA on the schedule. Over my twenty years in the video game industry, I have unfortunately personally witnessed many forms of sexism and I believe it’s a major problem in the industry. I strongly believe it is my duty to act as a positive force for women in video games.

So I was very disappointed when you personally refused to let me attend the Women’s Lunch. At the door, you said that men were expressly excluded from the event. Even more than being disappointed, I was surprised. Most major organizations dedicated to advancing women’s professional careers recognize that males have a helpful role to play, too. As a few examples: Women in Games International, San Francisco Women’s Council of Realtors, Financial Women of San Francisco, National Organization of Women, National Association of Women MBAs, and San Francisco Women Against Rape all permit men to attend their events, and to further the causes of these organizations.

Please reconsider your position on excluding men from future events. Many of my male colleagues would be proud to work alongside you to improve the status and respect for all women working in our industry.

Thank you for your consideration. I hope that you will permit forward-thinking men to be part of your efforts in the future.

Sincerely,

John Byrd

But the queens we use would not excite you

[Event “First Dad Bill game w computer”]
[Site “Chappell Rd, Charleston, WV”]
[Date “2013.12.10”]
[White “Dad Bill”]
[Black “Ippon RelWithDebugInfo”]
[Result “0-1”]
[Annotator “John Byrd and Fritz 13 (20m)”]

{This was John Byrd “Dad’s” first game against Superpawn, a cheesy little chess engine that I wrote. Dad taught me to play chess when I was very small. It’s fitting somehow that Dad got to play against this chess software that I wrote. Ippon only understands material and mobility, and so Ippon got his queen out early and proceeded to take all Dad’s pieces away promptly, one by one. Dad’s 71 years old now and I was just happy to have him play chess with “me”.} 1. c4 e6 2. e4 {last book move} Qg5 (2… d5 3. cxd5 exd5 4. e5 $14) 3. Qf3 (3. Nc3 $5 Qg6 4. Nge2 $16) 3… Bb4 (3… Nc6 4. Nc3 Nf6 5. d4 $11) 4. Nh3 Qe5 5. Bd3 (5. Nf4 $5 {deserves consideration} Be7 6. Nd3 $11) 5… Nc6 6. a3 {White threatens to win material: a3xb4} Bc5 7. b4 $4 {Hangs the rook on a1} (7. Nc3 $142 $15 {would allow White to play on}) {[%tqu “”,””,””,Bxf2+,””,10]} 7… Bxf2+ $1 {Fritz likes this move a lot, with the double attack on a1 and f2. I’m a little confused why ippon chose it, as ippon can only see 4 ply into the future. Wouldn’t ippon prefer to have kept the bishop instead of trashing it?} 8. Kxf2 (8. Kxf2 Qd4+ {Double attack} (8… Qxa1 {Zwischenzug})) (8. Qxf2 Qd4 {Decoy Double attack} (8… Qxa1 {Zwischenzug}) 9. O-O (9. Rf1) (9. Ng5)) (8. Nxf2 Qxa1 {Zwischenzug}) 8… Qd4+ 9. Ke1 (9. Qe3 Qxa1 10. Nc3 $19) 9… Qxa1 10. b5 Ne5 11. Qf4 (11. Qg3 {no good, but what else?} {[%tqu “”,””,””,d5,””,10] } d5 $1 {takes home the point} 12. cxd5 exd5 13. Bc2 (13. exd5 {[%emt 0:00:00]} Nxd3+ {[%emt 0:00:06]} 14. Qxd3 {[%emt 0:00:02]} Ne7 {[%emt 0:00:01]} 15. Kf2 { [%emt 0:00:01]} Bf5 {[%emt 0:00:01]}) 13… dxe4 14. Nf2 $19) 11… Nxd3+ 12. Ke2 Nxf4+ 13. Nxf4 Qxb1 14. Nd3 Qc2 15. Rf1 Qxc4 16. Rf3 Qxe4+ 17. Kf2 Qc4 18. Ke2 Qxb5 (18… e5 $5 {might be the shorter path} 19. Kd1 d6 20. h3 $19) 19. Bb2 f6 20. a4 {Dad said, “Might as well play it to the bitter end”} Qxa4 21. Ke3 e5 22. g4 Qxg4 23. Rg3 Qc4 24. Ba3 Qd4+ (24… Nh6 $142 {and Black has reached his goal} 25. Kf2 Nf5 26. Rh3 $19) 25. Ke2 Qe4+ 26. Re3 Qg2+ 27. Kd1 Qxh2 28. Kc2 d6 29. Nb4 Bf5+ 30. Rd3 Qg1 31. Nd5 Rc8 32. Kc3 Be4 (32… Qb1 33. Bc1 Qxd3+ 34. Kb2 Qc2+ 35. Ka3 Qxc1+ 36. Kb3 Bc2+ 37. Kc3 Bb1+ 38. Kb3 Qc2+ 39. Ka3 Qa2+ 40. Kb4 a5+ 41. Kb5 Bd3#) 33. Re3 Bxd5 34. Kb4 Qg4+ (34… Qb1+ 35. Bb2 Qxb2+ 36. Ka5 Qa2+ 37. Kb4 c5+ 38. Kc3 Qb3#) 35. Kb5 a6+ (35… Qc4+ 36. Ka5 b6#) 36. Ka5 Ne7 (36… b6+ 37. Kxa6 Qa4#) 37. Bc1 (37. Rc3 {cannot change destiny} b6+ 38. Kxa6 Qa4#) 37… Nc6# 0-1

Piece by piece

The house is superficially clean.  And the Christmas tree has come out and is decorated with delicate blue lights for the first time since Rachel died.  But the basement garage has been claimed by the spiders, and the swimming pool has become a Petri dish of leaves and ice.  Dad is 71 and he looks and thinks every day of it.  Since Rachel died in 2009 he’s been, I should say, distracted.  

Every day I have seen him in the past two years he has worn the same sweater.  It is stained with… something.  His favorite jacket is stained with… something.

We went shopping today.  First I took him to Target.  Four pairs of khakis (38×29) and a dozens of pairs of socks and undershirts and underwear.  Then to Men’s Wearhouse, and then to a shoe store for three pairs of new shoes.  

Then to a pizza place (Lola’s) that I found on Yelp.  He told me he didn’t remember the last time he had eaten pizza.

It’s the best I can do for him at this point.

I can’t stay here anymore.  I need to head over to see my Mom tomorrow.

Women wearing pantyhose, sing the chorus and it goes

It is the height of irony that conservatives passed, and now bemoan the passing of, the Defense of Marriage Act.

It is, I believe, an axiom of conservative thought (which I do not entirely disagree with) that government’s powers should be limited to that which is critical to the functioning of a stable society. Why then, do the standard conservative mouthpieces compare the death of DOMA variously to the fall of Rome, an illegitimate stench, and casual contempt for the citizenry?

As far as I can tell, only one conservative news source groks the gulf-wide internal contradiction and steers sensibly clear from it.

Anyway, it’s not polite to bash homosexuals anymore stateside. Even the conservatives can’t get away anymore with calling it a mental illness and the like. I believe, and am happy to believe, that the gay-bashing movement in the USA will quickly grow very, very, very quiet.

It is impossible to treat the Bible or the Qur’an as practical law and yet maintain that the government should have no business telling people how to live their lives.

You cannot serve both God and the Republican Party.

This particularly rapid, unintelligible patter

But there’s one other guaranteed shock-maker in the theater these days. That’s what happens when a particular, implicit covenant between theatermakers and theatergoers — one that exists even to this day — is violated. I mean the promise that no matter what’s presented onstage, you’ll be let off the hook at the end with some sort of reassurance or release, a sense of redemption or catharsis. When that release is denied — at least when it’s denied by artists in full control of their powers — audiences inevitably get angry.

Ben Brantley, chief theater critic, New York Times

Blooming

When I’m hard up for inspiration or peace, I occasionally I need to read Ivan’s words. Ivan Tcherepnin was a music professor who provided me this handout maybe 25 years ago. It’s here for the artists who might be further unlocked by his words.


 

I am not Allah
and cannot make you become composers
—I can’t even try, since that is up to you

I assigned John Cage first, because he, more than any other composer,
writes in a lucid way how ANYone can be a composer
like MCDC saying, “Anything is beautiful if you think it is”
or Wittgenstein, “Beauty is in the use of our clickers”
It takes lots of work, discipline and persistence and self-honesty
to even GET to the place where a composition idea of value can be discovered

If friends asked you about your courses during vacation
and you were talking about the composition class
you would say that you studied melodies, phrasing and modes
The interrelation of text, melody and rhythm
the combination of several voices in polyphony
the use of the canon as a tool to organize multiple voices
the emergence of harmonic progressions from polyphony
and development of themes based on harmonic progression
the use of periods and sentences as tools to organize musical ideas (motives)
you were given oodles of music, music to study for technical and/or inspirational purposes
and so on.

You heard about the existence of a cave
or mine shaft to which composers, after much digging,
have access (not guaranteed to find anything in there, either)

You have listened to your own work and seen yourselves in the mirror of your music
and found the mirror to be uneven, sometimes opaque—
requiring more practice, more tooling, more facility
But beware. The tools, the facility, the techniques are not the goal
at best they can be facilitators; at worst deceivers, creators of an illusion
that you are able to compose without the most essential factor present
which has no name, no shape, no presence aside from your own consciousness and spirit

Whether it is Cage saying, “Hey, no sweat, anyone can do it, it’s free, it’s fun” or Schoenberg saying, “You have miles to go before you can even imagine what composition is all about, and even then, you will be light years away from knowing enough of the literature to create anything faintly original”

the art is in your hands, and through your awareness and craft alone will you create something
which can begin to breathe life, communicate awareness and transport the listeners

In some cases, you would do better to let go of wanting to master traditional practices and try to invent your own wheels; in other cases, that would be too much to ask to unlearn for the sake of music

In any case, you should always get back to basic human needs, primal feelings, unlearned patterns of perception and cognition, principles of life on the surface of the earth in this epoch, at the twilight of the 21st Century

too much looking back or fascination with the past is dangerous

better to leapfrog over the civilized past, leap back and forth between different parts of the earth, separated by time and place

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

this is a prelude to the Modal Modules, which focus, as did canon, on a technical, theoretical means to organize multiple voices in musical compositions
There is no substitute for your own experimentation, mentation and persistent, disciplined digging into the musical earth

—Ivan Tcherepnin